A lot of players in cardrooms feel the need to stare each other down
when faced with difficult decisions. They nervously ask themselves:
“Did that player just hit the flush?”
“Was I being slowplayed on the flop?”
“Is he sensing weakness from me, or does he really have a hand?”
When faced with tough situations, a player instinctively looks to scope
out their opponent. They see whether or not their opponent is shaking,
where their eyes are, and their overall body language. If their opponent
looks uncomfortable though, what does this tell them? That he’s
uncomfortable with his hand or he’s uncomfortable being stared
at, or both? While physical tells may help assess a situation and get
a read, there’s a more important cue that should have been picked
up on. That is their betting patterns.
If I have been sitting at a table for a while, I’ll watch hands
that I am both involved in and not involved in. What I’m looking
for is how a player plays a particular hand. This includes the way they
bet as well as their body language when they bet. After a showdown where
I see a player’s hole cards, I will re-play the hand in my head
and see if I think it was played unusually. Suppose you’re in
a $1/$2 no-limit hold’em ring game and witness the following hand:
UTG (under the gun, or first to act) raises to $6, UTG+1 calls, you
fold some rags, 3 folds, CO re-raises to $10, 2 folds, BB (big blind)
calls, UTG calls, and UTG+1 calls.
Board: Ah Js 7s
Pot: $41
BB checks, UTG checks his cards and bets $5, UTG+1 thinks for a bit
and raises to $10, CO quickly calls, BB looks disgusted and folds.
Board: Ah Js 7s 4d
Pot: $71
UTG checks his cards again and bets $10, UTG+1 looks at UTG in a frustrated
way and calls, CO slowly raises to $25, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls looks
like he’s going to explode and calls.
Board: Ah Js 7s 4d 3h
Pot: $146
UTG checks his cards for the last time before betting $15, UTG+1 sighs
and folds, CO thinks and announces raise to $55 very casually, and UTG
says “if you have the straight, you got it” before calling.
Pot: $256
UTG turns over As Td for a pair of Aces, and CO turns over Jh Jc for
a set of Jacks to take the pot. UTG looks very disappointed at the result
and looks like he just got hit by a truck.
What conclusions can we draw just from this hand? Let’s look
at each players’ actions on all streets.
Let’s start with UTG. He bet out every street, and the bet made
was very small compared to the size of the pot. It seems like he was
just betting and calling the raises because he had a pair of aces and
wanted to get value for it but not lose anyone in the process by betting
too much. He was just playing his own two cards; it’s not every
hand he has top pair in a pot with hundreds of dollars in it. When the
backdoor straight hit on the river, he thought his opponent might have
a straight. No reasonable player would think that based on the way the
hand was played. He also thought that if his opponent didn’t have
a straight, he had the hand for sure. That is more evidence of him just
playing his own two cards and not minding how other people are playing
theirs. As long as this player is sitting in the game, he’s going
to be losing more than his fair share of pots.
UTG+1 played this hand strangely. After raising UTG’s bet the
minimum amount on the flop, he proceeded to just call the turn and fold
on the river to UTG’s $15 bet in a $161 pot. It’s apparent
that his hand was worth something on the flop when he raised, but worthless
by the river. It matches the description of an oddly played drawing
hand. He was a little irritated that he was bet into on the turn so
definitely didn’t like the bet, so he probably raised the flop
to try to get a free card on the turn for his draw. My guess is that
this player is used to playing limit hold’em.
From this hand alone, I would assume that the CO has one tendency that
is very common among many players: slowplaying the flop and raising
(or checkraising) the turn. I don’t mind this type of play, but
when the pot is multiway and large with the flop having a few draws,
slowplaying is foolish. When CO chose to just call the bet and raise
on the flop, he gave UTG+1 good pot odds to outdraw him on the turn.
On the turn CO played slightly better by finally choosing to raise,
but he didn’t even raise it a moderate amount to prevent UTG+1
to keep drawing at him profitably. I would remember how suspicious CO
looked when he raised on the turn when a blank fell. Overall I see CO
as a much better player than UTG, but not great at playing the odds
and reading the board.
It is hard to say what BB called a raise and reraise preflop with to
instantly fold on the flop. If he had KK or QQ then he played it very
foolishly by not putting the 3rd raise in. Without knowing what he had,
it is hard to judge what kind of player he is.
By combining actions and physical tells, you have deduced a few betting
patterns to establish reads of each player involved in that hand. These
reads should not be cast in stone though, because all that has been
observed is one hand. Take them lightly, but use them. Here are some
situations where adjustments can be made:
Making Reads
- HOME
- GETTING STARTED WITH INTERNET POKER
- STARTING HAND GUIDE
- ADAM’S WSOP ADVENTURES
- ADAM’S POKER JOURNAL
- POKER SITE REVIEWS
- BONUS CODES
- RADIO SHOW ARCHIVES
- NO-LIMIT STRATEGY
by Terrence Chan - BEGINNERS CORNER
by Larry N - MAKING READS by Barry
- THE WAY I SEE IT by Mike McManus
- PERSONAL POKER TRAINER
- ASK POKER PRO
Adam Schwartz - POKER
TOURNAMENT
LISTINGS - RAKEBACK
- POKER FORUM
- NEWSLETTER
- LINKS
- CONTACT
|
|
||||
homecontact
ussitemapFAQsterms & conditionsadvertiseprivacy | | | | | |